Both diseases come from breathing dust at work, and both take years to appear. The case is built from where you worked and what you worked with.
September 2026: Both diseases come from breathing dust at work, and both take years to appear. Asbestos exposure is usually decades in the past. Silicosis is frequently current, and the fastest-growing group of claims involves workers cutting engineered stone countertops.
These cases are built from two things: the work history and the pathology. Where you worked, in what years, with which materials, and a diagnosis confirmed by imaging and pulmonary testing. The filing clock generally runs from diagnosis rather than from exposure.
These claims turn on product identification and work history, built from employment and union records rather than a single incident. That is the actual work.
A flat contingency fee and nothing out of pocket. The firm advances every case expense, and if there is no recovery you owe nothing, including expenses.
The firm is small on purpose. Aimée Robert works the file, and a first conversation is confidential, free, and commits you to nothing.
Usually an exposure that ended decades ago.
Asbestos was used in insulation, pipe lagging, gaskets, brake components, joint compound, floor and ceiling tile, and shipbuilding. Anyone who cut it, installed it, tore it out, or worked alongside someone who did may have breathed it.
The diseases associated with it, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis, have long latency periods. A diagnosis today commonly traces to work performed decades earlier, which is why these cases are built from employment and union records rather than from memory alone.
Household exposure counts. Family members who washed work clothes have brought claims on the same evidence.
This one is not historical. It is happening now.
Engineered stone countertop material contains a far higher share of crystalline silica than natural granite. Cutting, grinding, and polishing it dry releases respirable dust, and the workers doing that are often young, frequently working in small fabrication shops, and in many cases were never given effective respiratory protection or wet-cutting equipment.
The resulting disease can progress faster and at younger ages than the classic occupational pattern. Silica exposure also reaches foundry work, sandblasting, mining, tunneling, and construction generally.
Claims in this area are typically brought against manufacturers and suppliers of the material and of the equipment, on failure-to-warn and design theories.
The people most at risk are frequently the least likely to call a lawyer.
Countertop fabrication, demolition and renovation, shipyard and refinery maintenance, brake and clutch work, foundry and abrasive blasting, tunneling and drilling. Much of this is small-shop work, and a meaningful share of it is done by workers who assume that an occupational illness is simply the cost of the trade.
It is not. Where a manufacturer knew the dust was hazardous and the warning did not match the risk, that is a product case, and it is separate from any workers compensation claim.
The single most useful thing you can do before calling anyone is write down where you worked, in what years, and what you handled. Job by job, site by site, including the short jobs and the ones through a union hall.
Then gather what supports it: Social Security earnings records, union records, W-2s, employment files, and the names of anyone who worked alongside you. Coworker testimony does real work in these cases, and people move away or pass on.
On the medical side, keep the imaging, the pulmonary function testing, and above all the pathology report. The filing deadline generally runs from the date of diagnosis, not from the exposure, so a diagnosis today can support a claim about work performed a very long time ago.
These are not workplace accident claims and they are not limited to what a workers compensation system will pay. They are product claims against the companies that made and sold the material, on the argument that the hazard was known and the warning did not match it.
Which materials, which manufacturers, which years. That reconstruction is what separates a claim that can be filed from one that cannot.
The filing period generally runs from diagnosis rather than exposure, which is why a case from decades-old work can still be brought today.
Engineered stone fabrication is producing disease in workers now, often young ones. This is not only a historical docket.
A product claim against a manufacturer is distinct from a workers compensation claim against an employer. Having one does not foreclose the other.
Decades. The diseases associated with asbestos have long latency periods, and a diagnosis today commonly traces to work performed many years earlier. Because the filing period generally runs from the date of diagnosis rather than the date of exposure, old work can still support a claim.
Engineered stone countertop material contains a much higher share of crystalline silica than natural stone. Cutting and polishing it dry releases respirable dust. Claims in this area allege that manufacturers and equipment suppliers knew the hazard and that the warnings and safety guidance did not match it.
Generally yes, because they are different claims against different parties. Workers compensation runs against an employer. A product claim runs against the company that made or sold the material. Having one does not automatically foreclose the other, though how they interact depends on the facts and the state.
A written work history covering every job, site, and year, then Social Security earnings records, union records, and employment files to support it. On the medical side, the pathology report, imaging, and pulmonary function testing. Also write down anyone who worked alongside you, because coworker testimony matters and people become hard to find.
Robert Law Group is a Houston, TX and Salt Lake City, UT based law firm. The information provided on this site is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
